CCQM-K143

MEASURAND   Mass fraction of copper in calibration solutions

NOMINAL VALUE 10 g/kg

Degrees of equivalence represented by Di and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence, both dimensionless.

Relative mass fraction of Copper in calibration solutions
Di
Participating institutes

CLOSER VIEW

CCQM-K143

MEASURAND   Mass fraction of copper in calibration solutions

NOMINAL VALUE 10 g/kg

Degrees of equivalence represented by Di and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence, both dimensionless.

LABi Di Uneg,i Upos,i
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
KEBS -0.04569 0.03123
NIST -0.00096 0.00144
KRISS -0.00086 0.00151
PTB -0.00085 0.00162
NMISA -0.00055 0.00145
NMIJ -0.00052 0.00193
UME -0.00044 0.00156
UNIIM -0.00029 0.00161
CENAM -0.00025 0.00158
NPLI -0.00025 0.00199
INMETRO 0.00010 0.00176
LGC 0.00013 0.00143
SNSU-BSN 0.00014 0.00146
NIM 0.00058 0.00148
CODELCO 0.00071 0.00152
INM 0.00087 0.00169
NRC 0.00089 0.00148
BAM 0.00124 0.00147
JRC 0.00992 0.00158
Participating institutes
CCQM-K143

CCQM-K143 is a model 2 comparison, for which each participating institute prepared a copper calibration solution with a target mass fraction of (10.0 +/- 0.1) g/kg and sent aliquots of the prepared solution to the pilot laboratory for comparisons with aliquots sent by all the other participants.  The participants were not told to prepare a solution of exactly 10 g/kg, but only to declare to the pilot lab what they thought their copper mass fraction values were.  The pilot laboratory compared the solutions and their declared copper mass fractions on a relative basis only.  No KCRV could be established; the KCRV was necessarily very close to 1, with no units.  In essence, if a participant's degree of equivalence is acceptable, it means that they were able to prepare the solution they stated within the uncertainty with which the pilot laboratory could perform the experimental evaluation.

Comparison
Comparison close
CC comparison
Linked comparison
CCQM-K143
Metrology area, Sub-field Chemistry and Biology, Inorganics
Description Copper calibration solutions
Time of measurements 2017 - 2019
Status Approved for equivalence
Final Reports of the comparisons
Measurand Copper mass fraction
 

Nominal value: 10 g/kg
Transfer device Dedicated samples
Comparison type Key Comparison
Consultative Committee CCQM (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance)
Conducted by CCQM (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance)
Comments
 
Pilot institute NIST
National Institute of Standards and Technology
United States
Contact person Michael Winchester

+1-301-975-3886
Additional
First Name Last Name
wwww@ww.www +356719836 Institute 1 Institute 1 Khmelnitskiy
Pilot laboratory
NIST

National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States, SIM

BAM

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung, Germany, EURAMET

CENAM

Centro Nacional de Metrologia, Mexico, SIM

CODELCO

Chemical Laboratory of CODELCO Norte Division, Chile, SIM

INM

National Institute of Metrology, Romania, EURAMET

INMETRO

Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia, Brazil, SIM

JRC

Joint Research Centre, European Union, EURAMET

KEBS

Kenya Bureau of Standards, Kenya, AFRIMETS

KRISS

Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Korea, Republic of, APMP

LGC

Laboratory of the Government Chemist, United Kingdom, EURAMET

NIM

National Institute of Metrology, China, APMP

NMIJ AIST

National Metrology Institute of Japan, Japan, APMP

NMISA

National Metrology Institute of South Africa, South Africa, AFRIMETS

NPLI

CSIR National Physical Laboratory of India, India, APMP

NRC

National Research Council, Canada, SIM

PTB

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany, EURAMET

SNSU-BSN

National Measurement Standard - National Standardization Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia, APMP

UME

TÜBITAK Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü, Türkiye, EURAMET

CCQM-K143

MEASURAND   Mass fraction of copper in calibration solutions

NOMINAL VALUE 10 g/kg

 

The key comparison reference value xR and its associated standard uncertainty uR are obtained using a DerSimonian-Laird estimator of the relative sensitivity values Si for qualified participants as explained on page 14 of the Final report.

        xR = 1.00001     uR = 0.00020

The degree of equivalence of laboratory i relative to the key comparison reference value xR is given by a pair of terms, both dimensionless:

Di = (Si - xR) and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence.

CCQM-K143

MEASURAND   Mass fraction of copper in calibration solutions

NOMINAL VALUE 10 g/kg

 

xi   measured value submitted by laboratory iLabi

ui   combined standard uncertainty of xi

Si        relative sensitivity value for participant's measured solution

u (Si ) standard uncertainty of Si

Labi xi  (Note 1) ui Si u(Si)
  g/kg g/kg    
BAM 9.999495 0.000070 1.00125 0.00016
CENAM 9.9997 0.0077 0.99976 0.00036
CODELCO 9.9897 0.0009 1.00072 0.00029
INM 9.993 0.011 1.00088 0.00050
INMETRO 9.998 0.012 1.00011 0.00055
JRC 9.99136 0.00005 1.00993 0.00024
KEBS 10.40 0.380 0.95432 0.01559
KRISS 10.0007 0.0019 0.99916 0.00041
LGC 9.9915 0.0011 1.00015 0.00017
NIM 9.999 0.004 1.00059 0.00022s
NIST 9.96438 0.00007 0.99905 0.00013
NMIJ 9.9999 0.0020 0.99946 0.00018
NMISA 9.9910 0.0140 0.99949 0.00068
NPLI 9.965 0.013 0.99976 0.00072
NRC 10.0040 0.0034 1.00090 0.00023
PTB 10.00103 0.00011 0.99915 0.00028
SNSU-BSN 9.9836 0.00085 1.00014 0.00012
UME 9.989 0.007 0.99957 0.00034
UNIIM 9.9910 0.0085 0.99972 0.00040

Note 1 : These results were submitted by each participant as claimed mass fractions and uncertainties based on gravimetric preparation. 
These solutions were measured as part of CCQM K143, and these values should be used to assess the validity of uncertainties of any related CMC claims.